Experiences in the use of multiple doses of convalescent plasma in critically ill patients with COVID-19 (preprint)

At the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, transfusion of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) was considered as one of the possibilities to help severe patients to overcome COVID-19 disease. The use of CCP has been controversial as its effectiveness depends on many variables from the plasma donor and the COVID-19 patient, for example, time of convalescence or symptoms onset. This was a feasibility study assessing the safety of multiple doses of CCP in mechanically ventilated intubated patients with respiratory failure due to COVID-19. Thirty (30) patients with severe respiratory failure, in ICU, with invasive mechanical ventilation received up to 5 doses of 300 to 600 ml of CP on alternate days (0,2,4,6 and 8) until extubation, futility, or death. Nineteen patients received five doses, seven received four, and four had 2 or 3 doses. On day 28 of follow-up, 57% of patients recovered and were at home and the long-term mortality observed was 27%. The ten severe adverse events reported in the study were unrelated to CCP transfusion. This study suggests that transfusion of multiple doses of convalescent plasma (CP) is safe. This strategy may represent an option to use in new studies, given the potential benefit of CCP transfusions in the early stage of infection in unvaccinated populations and in settings where monoclonal antibodies or antivirals are contraindicated or not available.

Development of in-house, indirect ELISAs for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-associated serology in COVID-19 patients in Panama. (preprint)

COVID-19 is the name of the acute respiratory disease caused by the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, a close relative of those that caused the severe outbreaks of SARS and MERS several years ago. Since its first appearance in December of 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused extremely high levels of mortality, morbidity, global economic breakdown, and consequent human suffering. While vaccination efforts are not extensive and rapid enough, the main tools to keep the virus under control are still keeping physical distancing, reinforce personal hygiene measures, using masks and early diagnosis of virus-infected persons, either symptomatic or not. The main diagnostic test for the confirmation of symptomatic individuals is the detection of viral RNA by reverse transcriptase-quantitative real-time PCR (RT-PCR). Additionally, serology techniques, such as ELISA are extremely useful to measure the antibodies generated in humans after virus contact, as well as the direct presence of viral antigens. In this study we aim to assemble and evaluate four ELISAs assays to measure the presence of IgG or IgM specific for the viral Spike protein in COVID-19 patients, using either the full recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein or the fragment corresponding to the receptor-binding domain. As a control, we also analyzed a group of prepandemic serum samples obtained before 2017. Strong reactivity was observed against both antigens. A few prepandemic samples displayed high OD values, suggesting the possibility of some crossreactivity. All four assays show very good repeatability, both intra-, and inter-assay; however, no clear relationship could be detected between positivity and time of sample collection for serology. Receiver operating characteristic analysis allowed the definition of cutoffs and evaluation of performance for each ELISA by estimation of the area under the curve. This performance parameter was high for all tests (AUC range: 0.98-0.995). Multiple comparisons between tests revealed no significant difference between each other (P values: 0.24-0.95). Our results show that both antigens are very effective to reveal both specific IgG and IgM antibodies, with high sensitivity (range 0.929-0.99) and specificity (range 0.933-0.977). The estimated congruence with the RT-PCR test, as estimated by Cohen Kappa, indicates a high agreement in all cases (range 0.874-0.937). This test will allow health authorities to have a new tool to estimate seroprevalence and to manage and improve the serious sanitary situation created by this virus.

Performance of a point of care test for detecting IgM and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and seroprevalence in blood donors and health care workers in Panama (preprint)

Novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the etiologic agent of the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which has reached 28 million cases worldwide in eight months. The serological detection of antibodies against the virus will play a pivotal role in complementing molecular tests to improve diagnostic accuracy, contact tracing, vaccine efficacy testing and seroprevalence surveillance. Here, we aimed first to evaluate a lateral flow assays ability to identify specific IgM and IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and second, to report the seroprevalence of these antibodies among health care workers and healthy volunteer blood donors in Panama. We recruited study participants between April 30th and July 7th, 2020. For the test validation and performance evaluation, we analyzed serum samples from participants with clinical symptoms and confirmed positive RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2, participants with other confirmed infectious diseases, and a set of pre-pandemic serum samples. We used two by two table analysis to determine the test sensitivity and specificity as well as the kappa agreement value with a 95% confidence interval. Then, we used the lateral flow assay to determine seroprevalence among serum samples from COVID-19 patients, potentially exposed health care workers, and healthy volunteer donors. Our results show this assay reached a positive percent agreement of 97.2% (95% CI 84.2-100.0%) for detecting both IgM and IgG. The assay showed a kappa of 0.898 (95%CI 0.811-0.985) and 0.918 (95% CI 0.839-0.997) for IgM and IgG, respectively. The evaluation of serum samples from hospitalized COVID-19 patients indicates a correlation between test sensitivity and the number of days since symptom onset; the highest positive percent agreement (87% (95% CI 67.0-96.3%)) was observed at [≥]15 days post-symptom onset. We found an overall antibody seroprevalence of 11.6% (95% CI 8.5-15.8%) among both health care workers and healthy blood donors. Our findings suggest this lateral flow assay could contribute significantly to implementing seroprevalence testing in locations with active community transmission of SARS-CoV-2.